CRSTS: St. Mary's C Of E Primary School - Highways Measures

Page 1 of 4

Closes 21 Sep 2026

This service needs cookies enabled.

Have Your Say

1. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the proposal to introduce a one-way operation (southbound) of the service road between Southcliffe Road and Broomfield Drive with a northbound contra-flow cycle lane (including extension of the double yellow lines)?

This is proposed to address existing conflict between northbound and southbound vehicles along this narrow section and reduce the likelihood of vehicles parking on the eastern footway (commonly known as the pavement). Due to the tight turn into the service road larger vehicles travelling northbound on Reddish Road may no longer be able to turn directly into the service road but an alternative route would be available via Abingdon Road, with parking restrictions proposed to support this.

If you wish to view the proposals, please click here.

2. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the proposal of double yellow lines (No Waiting At Any Time restrictions) being provided at the junctions of Southcliffe Road / Ambleside Road, Ambleside Road / Coniston Road and Coniston Road / Reddish Road Service Road?

This is proposed in order to keep these junctions free of parked vehicles, protecting intervisibility between pedestrians and motorists whilst also ensuring vehicles can negotiate the junctions safely.

If you wish to view the proposals, please click here.

If you do not agree / strongly agree with the proposed double yellow lines at all three junctions, please could you specify which sections of the proposals you disagree / strongly disagree with?

3. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the proposal to improve the footway cycleway (including the provision bollards), connecting the existing Toucan crossing on Reddish Road to Broadstone Hall Road South and Broomfield Drive?

If you wish to view the proposals, please click here.

4. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the proposal to build out the footway (including the provision bollards), and provide a raised road surface at the junctions of Broomfield Drive and Southcliffe Road with Reddish Road?

This is proposed to tighten the junction radii, encourage lower vehicular speeds, provide pedestrians with a level crossing point and to prevent pavement parking. 

If you wish to view the proposals, please click here.

5. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the proposed highway measures on Broomfield Drive including footway build outs (including the provision bollards), at the junction with Broom Avenue, the provision of a vehicle dropped crossing to replace the existing radii junction for No 30-44 Broomfield Drive, provision of a dropped kerb at the eastern end of Broomfield Drive and the provision of bollards at the junction with Broomfield Avenue and Broomfield Drive?

This is proposed to better accommodate pedestrian movements.

If you wish to view the proposals, please click here.

6. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the proposed footway build outs and the provision of tactile paving at the junction of Broadstone Hall Road South / St Mary’s Drive?

This is proposed to improve the provision for pedestrians and encourage lower vehicular speeds. 

If you wish to view the proposals, please click here.

7. If you have any comments on the proposals, please enter them here: